From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Aug 23 11:20:14 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ru.ac.za (lucifer.ru.ac.za [146.231.26.73])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED0814F35
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@lucifer.ru.ac.za)
Received: from freebsd by lucifer.ru.ac.za with local (Exim 3.03 #1)
	id 11IyoW-000JJF-00
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:27:24 +0200
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:27:23 +0200
From: Siviwe Kwatsha <freebsd@lucifer.ru.ac.za>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Linear Speedup for NT (SMP) ?
Message-ID: <19990823202723.A74208@lucifer.ru.ac.za>
Reply-To: freebsd@lucifer.ru.ac.za
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello,

Someone just told me that NT has linear speedup on SMP.

While I think it's a ridiculous claim that software can fix architectural 
problems, I'm keen to move to NT if it _does_ gives me linear support.

Hopefully someone will tell me it's all Microsoft false-advertising bullshit 
again. 

Eagerly awaiting that response :)

- Siviwe 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message