Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      08 May 1998 11:47:42 +0200
From:      dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= )
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libftpio ftpio.c
Message-ID:  <xzpogx9w0u9.fsf@skejdbrimir.ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Thu, 07 May 1998 10:28:08 -0700"
References:  <7854.894562088@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> writes:
> > Does that mean renaming all functions as well? What will happen to
> > software which currently uses libftpio? It will at the very least be
> > necessary to change the Makefiles (-lfetch instead of -lftpio)...
> Like I said, I'd handle the other 2 major consumers of libftpio if
> somebody wanted to do libftpio and fetch.  It will be a bit of a pain
> from the apps programmer's perspective, but better to do it now before
> too many apps are using it.

OK, I took a quick look at it last night. My approach so far is to
write a new library (libfetch) and integrate the code from fetch and
libftpio into it. The libfetch interface consists of two functions:

FILE *fetchGetURL(char *URL, int flags);
FILE *fetchPutURL(char *URL, int flags);

which work as you'd expect. The flags parameter is used to specify
options such as passive mode, text/binary mode, verbosity, possibly
also protocol version (HTTP 1.0 / HTTP 1.1).

With this approach you gain generality at the expense of efficiency,
since you lose the single-connection-multiple-fetch functionality of
ftpio. To avoid this, I could allow direct access to the various
handlers and provide fetchGetURL() and fetchPutURL() simply as
convenient front-ends rather than as recommended entry point. Should
keeping the single-connection-multiple-fetch functionality be a big
priority?

Right now I'm reading a truckload of RFCs to make sure I don't make
any big blunders :)

-- 
Noone else has a .sig like this one.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpogx9w0u9.fsf>