From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 21 10:55: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AA414C3B for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 10:55:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA49975; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 10:53:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199903211853.KAA49975@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Dennis Cc: Matthew Dillon , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Gigabit ethernet revisited In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 Mar 1999 10:01:20 EST." <199903211449.JAA15387@etinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 10:53:42 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The most I've done with freebsd is ~52,000pps on a 200Mhz box... > 66Mb/s throughput, but thats also as high as I've tried. The CPU > doesnt even blink. Don't beat me up for this but you can send a > LOT more packets from a Linux 2.2 box then you can from a > FreeBSD one. Why can linux process more packets than FreeBSD? Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message