From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Dec 15  7:30: 4 2000
From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 15 07:30:00 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.interware.hu (mail.interware.hu [195.70.32.130])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5772437B402
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 07:29:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from timbuktu-41.budapest.interware.hu ([195.70.51.233] helo=elischer.org)
	by mail.interware.hu with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 146wnu-0002n3-00; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:29:51 +0100
Sender: julian@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-ID: <3A39FDCB.236A069A@elischer.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 03:17:31 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386)
X-Accept-Language: en, hu
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patrick Bihan-Faou <patrick@netzuno.com>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: PPPoE w/ nat auto fragmentation hack?
References: <POEDLEGGIEKJJIOGHEJNCEADCEAA.patrick@netzuno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> 
d
> 
> So anyway to answer your question quickly, this feature does not belong to
> ng_pppoe. PPP is a much better place for it, libalias would (for me) be even
> better.

I would have to agree with this..

-- 
      __--_|\  Julian Elischer
     /       \ julian@elischer.org
    (   OZ    ) World tour 2000
---> X_.---._/  presently in:  Budapest
            v



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message