Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:47:14 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "make package" vs "pkg create" Message-ID: <20130224174714.58606233ced33e520784d025@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <512A40E9.805@gmail.com> References: <512A40E9.805@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:33:45 -0600 Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com> wrote: > I tried making a build jail, not with pourdriere or tinderbox. I just > went to the ports and ran `make -DBATCH package-recursive clean` to get > packages created. I ran `pkg add *` in the packages/All directory, but > all failed because of MANIFEST missing. I'm guessing this is a bug in > the .mk files, since I do have WITH_PKGNG set. No bug, but you will need to run pkg repo to turn the collection of packages you've built into a pkgng repository. > Is this a known problem > or is there supposed to be a different way to do it? Am I just supposed > to use pourdriere or the source to keep my ports up to date until all > the packages are rebuilt on freebsd.org? You don't need to use poudriere but it is very convenient once set up. For example - updating the ports tree and rebuilding the affected ports poudriere ports -u poudriere bulk -f /root/packages -j build build is my build jail, and /root/packages is a file listing the packages I want. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130224174714.58606233ced33e520784d025>