Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:28:59 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r367883 - in head: Mk lang/gcc Message-ID: <0496640B-F902-401E-B02E-E85506A2FFF5@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <54122471.70109@FreeBSD.org> References: <201409101909.s8AJ9wpY028698@svn.freebsd.org> <5410AEB5.9050205@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1409102231390.2867@tuna.site> <54122471.70109@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Sep, 2014, at 18:38, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On 9/10/2014 4:32 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> Thanks for writing up a summary of changes. Very useful. I learned=20=
>>> about AddressSanitizer being supported.
>>=20
>> You are very welcome! (I haven't tested AddressSanitizer myself,=20
>> but think I recall a positive report by a user. If it does not=20
>> work properly we might look into lang/gcc49 or lang/gcc5.)
>=20
> Actually it fails to link. Both clang and gcc complain about missing
> libasan symbols.
>=20
> I find no providers of libasan in any of the gcc, llvm or clang =
packages.
>=20
> It appears it is a submodule of both gcc and clang. So it likely just
> need to be hooked up in the build for gcc.
>=20
> Simple test case:
>=20
> # echo 'int main() {return 0;}'|g++5 -Wall -fsanitize=3Daddress -o
> /dev/null -x c -
> /usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find -lasan
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
=46rom lang/gcc/work/gcc-4.8.3/libsanitizer/configure.tgt:
case "${target}" in
x86_64-*-linux* | i?86-*-linux*)
if test x$ac_cv_sizeof_void_p =3D x8; then
TSAN_SUPPORTED=3Dyes
fi
;;
powerpc*le-*-linux*)
UNSUPPORTED=3D1
;;
powerpc*-*-linux*)
;;
sparc*-*-linux*)
;;
x86_64-*-darwin[1]* | i?86-*-darwin[1]*)
TSAN_SUPPORTED=3Dno
;;
*)
UNSUPPORTED=3D1
;;
esac
In configure output:
checking for libsanitizer support=85 no
# Adam
--=20
Adam Weinberger
adamw@adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org
>=20
>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On a related note, when trying to commit the PORTREVISION bump=20
>> related to this commit, I ended up with:
>>=20
>> svn: E165001: Commit failed (details follow):
>> svn: E165001: Commit blocked by pre-commit hook (exit code 1) with =
output:
>> Do not commit ports with NOPORTDOCS or NOPORTEXAMPLES.
>> The port must be converted to proper OPTIONS. See
>> =
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile=
-options.html
>>=20
>> Not super helpful since it did not indicate which of the 1000+ ports=20=
>> actually failed this test. ;-) I could bypass this using Approved:
>> portmgr (implicit).
>>=20
>> Gerald
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Regards,
> Bryan Drewery
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0496640B-F902-401E-B02E-E85506A2FFF5>