From owner-freebsd-arch  Wed Jul 12  8:30:51 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8B537C180
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no)
Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2])
	by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id RAA67268;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:30:44 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no)
Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost)
	by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA06404;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:30:44 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no)
X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:30:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no>
To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>,
	Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>,
	Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Why don't section 4 pages live with their drivers? 
In-Reply-To: <78679.963388979@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007121729300.6345-100000@login-1.eunet.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> You sure it's worth 1.2MB of repo bloat?

Isn't this repo-bloat thing going too far? I mean, it could appear as
though things are headed towards a point where any noncritical commit
will be banned due to bloat. </bite>

Marius



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message