From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 17 13:54: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D48158D9 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:53:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA05192; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 22:52:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Warner Losh Cc: Liam Slusser , Kenny Drobnack , "Harry M. Leitzell" , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:48:19 MDT." <199909172048.OAA05040@harmony.village.org> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 22:52:28 +0200 Message-ID: <5190.937601548@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199909172048.OAA05040@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >In message <5082.937599515@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >: There is a new kid in town if it comes to fortifying your FreeBSD >: box: jail(2|8) > >Is jail(2) in 3.3R? Or just -current? I ask because I had to have >different suser tests depending on 3.x and 4.0 in the chflags security >patches. Only current. I have no MFC plans. Although it could be trivially done I don't think there currently is a market demand for doing so, and I don't have the time anyway... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message