Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:01:29 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: peterjeremy@optushome.com.au Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Smarter kernel modules? Message-ID: <20030306.140129.14975742.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20030306191248.GD93350@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20030306075225.GB93350@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20030306.094104.08396502.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030306191248.GD93350@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20030306191248.GD93350@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> writes:
: That said, I feel that a single number (or variable name) is too
: coarse and the "do I need to bump the version" decision is too fuzzy.
: Unfortunately, I can't think of anything better that wouldn't incur
: an unacceptable maintenance overhead.
I want the decision to bump it to be "I can't make this change because
it would cause me to have to bump this version."
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030306.140129.14975742.imp>