Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 16:12:20 +0200 (MESZ) From: "Hr.Ladavac" <lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS locking (fwd) Message-ID: <199609111412.AA238531140@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Forwarded message from Jos Vissers ----- >From Jos.Vissers@telebyte.nl Wed Sep 11 15:23:18 MES 1996 From: Jos Vissers <Jos.Vissers@telebyte.nl> Message-Id: <199609111327.PAA14170@monet.telebyte.nl> Subject: Re: NFS locking To: lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at (Hr.Ladavac) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 15:27:07 +0200 (MET DST) In-Reply-To: <199609111314.AA227477684@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at> from "Hr.Ladavac" at Sep 11, 96 03:14:44 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hr.Ladavac wrote: > It will probably have to wait until Sun (SMI) people release the specs or > someone reverse engineers the NFS remote locking protocol. > > I guess you wouldn't be happy with NFS locking only among FreeBSD machines. I heard that Linux will be or is supporting it, and personally I'd rather stay with FreeBSD, but my employer is convinced that Linux is better. Jos -- Jos Vissers, System administrator Telebyte ----- End of forwarded message from Jos Vissers ----- Anyone knows anything about Linux NFS locking. Last I've heard it was rather confusing: client only/server grants the lock to everyone. Somewhat contradictory, indeed. /Marino
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609111412.AA238531140>