From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 15 11:53:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD2459B; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB66D8FC16; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7560023F763; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 06:53:45 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 onyx.glenbarber.us 7560023F763 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 06:53:43 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Chris H Subject: Re: MAC cloning available like Linux has? Message-ID: <20121215115343.GC1342@glenbarber.us> References: <22dff5a60850319d50ce4f1a07309562.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20121214230414.GF1959@glenbarber.us> <27119a9d879fd4fb124b517b1589d578.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27119a9d879fd4fb124b517b1589d578.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:53:47 -0000 --1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:26:06PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > ifconfig_ue0=3D"DHCP" > create_args_ue0=3D"ether ##:##:##:##:##:##" > create_args is simply ignored. >=20 Ignored how? What commands are you running to verify it works? For me, create_args_IFNAME works fine on my firewall. > I don't get it. I've tried every imaginable incarnation I > could possibly conceive. Is it even possible? I had really > hoped to turn this into a gateway, and while Linux will > "clone" the MAC(3). I don't trust it (security wise). > Is Linux' DHCP more robust than BSD'?! Hard to imagine, > but I'm completely at a loss. >=20 I do not think this is DHCP related. It is more differentiation between the two with regards to how interface creation is handled. Glen --1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQzGTHAAoJEFJPDDeguUajIQ8IAJZ9yP/2J7gSJJrHS5vwzRAX j6H76bDOxKmumbv2sUPF8COIptmGMahOwZCoeX9fG4geFqTS5Evm5UVn3Wnyj0Ip qUaKQLBP6nUH3lswTky7+qLdYJnKlnf/phacZ6YZCGrJrJS70WTIDuclRX3N/gQP ewnG3R91nStewX4xgaqxIBGF9btJAsN7XfEyuGgomDtdoW8Jy+Es7Ux0Pdn+PGP+ Q6nD66FediJu/Tf38lb77Dv/G3GXDyRY3PPyeL0d+XeIONYGRfccewpEQg+ZmYfl 5HfPF/gdIr3FJ/w4+7AavrSjxg5uVGOTfUi6syaXh7JexCOHjZrubEDxk47jBpA= =njJj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc--