From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 7 20:10:21 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id UAA24047 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 7 Feb 1995 20:10:21 -0800 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA24041 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 1995 20:10:20 -0800 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA17105; Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:03:23 MST From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9502080403.AA17105@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: Speed increase at CTM src-cur 304? To: jbeukema@HK.Super.NET (John Beukema) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:03:22 MST Cc: toor@jsdinc.root.com, davidg@Root.COM, sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "John Beukema" at Feb 8, 95 09:57:11 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Excuse my ignorance but what is the current relationship between FreeBSD > and BSD4.4 lite? That is, are these improvements, bug fixes to vm etc. a) > also fixes to BSD4.4 lite, b) strictly hardware dependent and therefore > separate, c) co-ordinated with BSD4.4 or d) generating one more new flavor > of BSD? In order with spin added? Successor. One of several. No. BSD4.4 lite is no longer being developed. No, it's not strictly hardware dependent. No. BSD4.4 lite is no longer being developed. Arguable. Can you have a new flavor of something that is no longer being developed? Or is it the first flavor of FreeBSD? Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.