Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:18:42 +0000 From: "Joao Barros" <joao.barros@gmail.com> To: qpadla@gmail.com Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support Message-ID: <70e8236f0802071018n389afa3bu161eaa5c6563cbc0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200802071941.23199.qpadla@gmail.com> References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> <47AAFDED.9030301@freebsd.org> <200802071941.23199.qpadla@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 7, 2008 5:41 PM, Nikolay Pavlov <qpadla@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday 07 February 2008 14:47:41 Eric Anderson wrote: > > FUSE is slow, requires a port (unless PUFFS is ported, which I've probed > > about before). > > I think this is not an argument: > http://www.ntfs-3g.org/performance.html > Eric has valid points. How relevant is a benchmark on Linux to your argument? -- Joao Barros
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70e8236f0802071018n389afa3bu161eaa5c6563cbc0>