From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 12 17:08:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82278BD9; Sun, 12 May 2013 17:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madpilot@FreeBSD.org) Received: from winston.madpilot.net (winston.madpilot.net [78.47.75.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0C3315; Sun, 12 May 2013 17:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from winston.madpilot.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3b7s7M65zhzFTRm; Sun, 12 May 2013 19:08:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at madpilot.net Received: from winston.madpilot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by winston.madpilot.net (winston.madpilot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fRnF6ciMs2GO; Sun, 12 May 2013 19:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by winston.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 12 May 2013 19:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <518FCC8E.2020304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 19:08:30 +0200 From: Guido Falsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Helfman Subject: Re: svn commit: r317962 - head/mail/postgrey References: <201305121429.r4CETkaH035795@svn.freebsd.org> <518FA9EA.6080503@FreeBSD.org> <518FB7C8.4040009@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 17:08:34 -0000 On 05/12/13 18:39, Jason Helfman wrote: > > Correct. my mistake. I'll contact the maintainer. > > > However you wish to proceed is up to you, however removing it doesn't > change the OPTIONS_DEFAULT, so I don't know why contacting the > maintainer is required in this case. > I always try to keep the maintainer in the loop. Explain them the changes, also not to surprise them with unexpected commits to their ports. I hope to get a fast turnaround for this fix. -- Guido Falsi