From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Mon Mar 19 15:06:34 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA3CF53545 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4722D736CA for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F2AF1F53542; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC01F53541 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:06:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [209.237.23.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D87736C7 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:06:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from roble.com (roble.com [209.237.23.50]) by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02F33E961 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: CVE-2017-7376 -- libxml2 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:06:34 -0000 Assuming FreeBSD's port is also vulnerable even though the OS is not listed in the CVE. Can anyone confirm? : Buffer overflow in libxml2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging an incorrect limit for port values when handling redirects. Roger Marquis