From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 16 10:46:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA01783 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:46:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mushi.colo.neosoft.com (mushi.colo.neosoft.com [206.109.6.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA01773 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:46:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@taronga.com) Received: (qmail 19188 invoked from network); 16 Oct 1998 17:46:15 -0000 Received: from bonkers.neosoft.com (HELO bonkers.taronga.com) (root@206.109.2.48) by mushi.colo.neosoft.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 1998 17:46:15 -0000 Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA11279 for hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 12:46:13 -0500 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Message-Id: <199810161746.MAA11279@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: ABOUT BSD To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 12:46:12 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <4.1.0.67.19981016133845.00aa4bd0@genesis.ispace.com> from "Drew Baxter" at Oct 16, 98 01:39:46 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Smallest machine I'll bother with now is maybe a 4dx4-100. Ran it on a > 386DX-33 for a while, I don't think I'd go back to that :-) I'm using a 486 DX/50. I wouldn't recommend a 386 for more than a dedicated box (you know, the sort of thing you'd dedicate a Pentium 200 or less to under NT ). I'm using 386 DX/20s for routers. Interestingly, a 386DX/20 is a lot peppier under FreeBSD than Linux. I'm using 2.2.6 on them. I can't get 3.0-BETA to install. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message