Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Jul 2000 21:16:24 +0900
From:      itojun@iijlab.net
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: KAME integration and plans 
Message-ID:  <4773.962799384@coconut.itojun.org>
In-Reply-To: kris's message of Wed, 05 Jul 2000 03:46:58 MST. <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007050342040.84259-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>These changes should only impact ipv6 and ipsec, with the exception of the
>DNS resolver code which I'm still unsure about merging (even though it's
>been well tested by KAME users, there remains the possibility of breakage
>for ipv4 resolution if there are undiscovered bugs)

	actually, I've touched sys/sys/mbuf.h.  there should be no behavior
	change if you do not use any of the following items:
	- ipsec
	- ipv6, inclding stf interface
	- gif interface
		gif can be used for v4 over v4.

	due to the change mentioned above, and recent checksum offloading
	stuff, some of network driver code may need fixes like below.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/lnc/if_lnc.c.diff?r1=1.78&r2=1.79
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/vx/if_vx.c.diff?r1=1.27&r2=1.28
	(if a driver sets M_PKTHDR flag manually, it needs checking)

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4773.962799384>