Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:27:29 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: EGCS, or EGCS? Message-ID: <19990927212729.A35565@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <99Sep27.155226est.40355@border.alcanet.com.au> References: <19990926233442.3238A1CC2@overcee.netplex.com.au> <99Sep27.155226est.40355@border.alcanet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Peter Jeremy: > That's the way I remembered things. What threw me is that I currently > have two _different_ gcc directories, both claiming to be EGCS 1.1.2, > and both being updated. The main reason is that we don't lose history with the directory change. At first we had contrib/gcc, then it moved into contrib/egcs then back to contrib/gcc. By importing egcs on top of 2.7.2.3 in contrib/gcc we have a clear line going from gcc to egcs to gcc in one place. As soon as 2.95.1 gets imported, contrib/egcs will disappear. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep 9 00:20:51 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990927212729.A35565>