From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:07:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA14D16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from liberty.onthenet.com.au (liberty.OntheNet.com.au [203.22.124.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFF743D58 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:07:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (CPE-30-210.dsl.onthenet.net [203.144.30.210]) i0CN77ZG075515; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:07:08 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <400328F4.6020609@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:08:36 +1000 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interest in 64-bit time_t for PPC port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:07:11 -0000 > We believe we can do that now, because there aren't all that many > sparc64 users, and most of them would rather get this change out- > of-the-way right now. Would this make sense for the PPC port, > too? I think so. > I am not running freebsd/ppc on anything yet, so I don't > think my opinion on this counts for much. Now's your chance :-) Since there's so few users, bin-compat isn't an issue, and it's a chance for me to drop in some binary incompat in the signal code. later, Peter.