Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Oct 2024 17:41:59 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 280440] security/openssh-portable: tcpwrappers no longer works with spawning processes
Message-ID:  <bug-280440-7788-5mITJBrEma@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-280440-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-280440-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280440

--- Comment #5 from mike@sentex.net ---
Note, For my use case I worked around the issue. I had a few customers where
geofencing was a requirement and hooked in ACLs another way that actually is
much more flexible. However, I would not be surprised if I was the last per=
son
on the planet using tcp_wrappers to make use of this old feature.  I think =
the
redesign to separate ssh sessions broke the previous patch, so more work th=
an a
few tweaks are probably needed.  If someone wants to close the ticket and j=
ust
declare tcp_wrappers no longer supported fully, I would be fine with it.=20

[1] I have a small golang daemon listening in on pflog0 looking for a provi=
ded
pf rule match. It then hands the IP off to a shell script that decides on a
number of criteria (country, reputation list etc) and either does nothing or
adds the IP to a block table and kills the existing state.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280440-7788-5mITJBrEma>