From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 12 21:44:22 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA07550 for current-outgoing; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 21:44:22 -0700 Received: from id.slip.bcm.tmc.edu (root@hou11.onramp.net [199.1.137.139]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA07542 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 21:44:19 -0700 Received: (from rich@localhost) by id.slip.bcm.tmc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id XAA09094; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 23:41:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 23:41:35 -0500 From: Rich Murphey Message-Id: <199509130441.XAA09094@id.slip.bcm.tmc.edu> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: current@freefall.freebsd.org In-reply-to: <324.810867210@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: Sound code: Anyone for -current code in 2.1? Reply-to: rich@lamprey.utmb.edu Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk |From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" | |Well, I've proven to my satisfaction that the GUS MAX doesn't really |work correctly in 2.1-STABLE (at least not with `maplay', at it's |documented as broken in 2.1's LINT) so I just need to know whether or |not all the soundblaster et al users out there are happier with the |-current sound code, or the 2.1-STABLE stuff. | |If it's 2.1-STABLE then I'll bow to the needs of the many and take a |broken GUS MAX for the time being. If it's 2.2, then I'll do the work |to integrate it into 2.1. You folks decide. Feedback please? I'm using sound.v30.5 with 2.1-stable and a GUS MAX and have seen no real problems, so I'd vote to bring it in as well. Rich