From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 12:56:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B2DD80; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19729BC; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:56:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from cpc16-cmbg15-2-0-cust60.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([86.5.162.61]:64772 helo=[192.168.0.7]) by ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:dc552) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1YdICI-0003a9-6o (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path ); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:56:42 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:56:38 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20150331190323.GF30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1427829555.3892.7.camel@hardenedbsd.org> <20150331192315.GH30115@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Rui Paulo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Sender: "Dr D. Chisnall" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:08:32 +0000 Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Sergei Vyshenski , current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Shawn Webb , ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:56:53 -0000 On 1 Apr 2015, at 05:03, Rui Paulo wrote: >=20 > That is expected. WITH_PKG=3Ddevel is a make(1) option that only = affects ports (non-binary pkgs). Are you sure? I have it in make.conf on one of my systems where I never = build ports manually (and don't even have a ports tree installed) and = there I get this: $ pkg -v 1.4.99.13 In a jail on the same machine without the make.conf entry, I get the = stable version. This is how I've been testing pkg-devel for a while. = Is there a different recommended way? David