From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Oct 23 1:10: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C4B37B405 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f9N8A1G94613; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200110230810.f9N8A1G94613@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ceri Subject: Re: bin/31393: portmap(1) cannot be bound solely to 127.0.0.1 Reply-To: Ceri Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/31393; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ceri To: Frank Tobin Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/31393: portmap(1) cannot be bound solely to 127.0.0.1 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:07:05 +0100 There is already a patch for this in bin/30235 I believe this problem no longer exists in -current, so this patch would need to be applied directly to -stable, so if you could test it out that would be good. Please submit followup to that PR, so that this PR can be closed. Ceri To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message