From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 2 19:44: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from swan.en-bio.com.au (swan.en-bio.com.au [203.35.254.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FDD152C1 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 19:44:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Tony.Maher@eBioinformatics.com) Received: from shad.internal.en-bio (www-cache.en-bio.com.au [203.35.254.2]) by swan.en-bio.com.au (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA02550; Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:43:50 +1100 Received: (from tonym@localhost) by shad.internal.en-bio (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id OAA27236; Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:43:30 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:43:30 +1100 (EST) From: Tony Maher Message-Id: <200001030343.OAA27236@shad.internal.en-bio> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Your misleading, no, LYING message to me Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing > people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end > and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on > him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8) I dont think so. Whatever PHK may or may not have done in the past his answers in this latest storm in a tea cup were more than reasonable and informative. > By a long shot the problem is NOT Karl. It takes at least > TWO to engage in a combatitive conflict -- that is if > you are not schizophreniac. Yes it was two - Karl vs reasoned discussion. tonym To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message