From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 16 05:54:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAEA16A4CE; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:54:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886FF43D1D; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1G5rnqd006834; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:53:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1G5rmgQ006833; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:53:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:53:48 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20050216055348.GA6793@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200502141722.10259.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200502151659.42594.nb_root@videotron.ca> <346a80220502151437627a9ef6@mail.gmail.com> <200502160027.55420.jkim@niksun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502160027.55420.jkim@niksun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: cokane@cokane.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updated quirk-driven R3000Z patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:54:20 -0000 On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 12:27:55AM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Tuesday 15 February 2005 05:37 pm, Coleman Kane wrote: > > Hi, I tested the patch posted by John on a compaq R3000. Works > > great, except still requires device atpic (for the mixed_mode > > operation I think). Kim posted a patch in this email: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/2005-January/00337 > >6.html. I dunno if the patch is kosher or not, however. It does > > allow me to run without using atpic. > > Ouch, you're absolutely correct. jhb's patch wasn't complete for > amd64. The missing piece is attached. Can you please re-test? Can we remove "device atpic" from GENERIC with this? Can an inflicted user try it out so we can add that change to the patch also? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)