From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 18 23:10:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19CAAD484F for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@feith.com) Received: from feith1.FEITH.COM (feith1.FEITH.COM [192.251.93.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D0D317CE for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@feith.com) Received: from jwlab.FEITH.COM (jwlab.FEITH.COM [192.251.93.16]) by feith1.FEITH.COM (8.14.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id u2IN6V9h003124 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:06:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from john@jwlab.FEITH.COM) Received: from jwlab.FEITH.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jwlab.FEITH.COM (8.14.9+Sun/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u2IN6VVN024374 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:06:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from john@localhost) by jwlab.FEITH.COM (8.14.9+Sun/8.14.9/Submit) id u2IN6U5t024373 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:06:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:06:30 -0400 (EDT) From: John Wehle Message-Id: <201603182306.u2IN6U5t024373@jwlab.FEITH.COM> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: trivial freebsd 9 (and later) route patch reminder / question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-DCC--Metrics: feith1; whitelist X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 192.251.93.1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 01:05:43 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:10:06 -0000 Noticed in 2013 a problem with FreeBSD 9 due to a MFC which broke my VPN. There's a bug report with a trivial patch at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179829 The problem is still present in FreeBSD 10 and the code in HEAD also looks unchanged (meaning the problem likely still exists). It would nice to fix the problem before FreeBSD 11 is branched. Does the current bug report suffice, or is it buried since it was originally discovered on FreeBSD 9? Basically I wasn't sure if I needed to open a new report against HEAD. -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com | | John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------