From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Apr 25 10: 0:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D48337B433 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3PH03D15635; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200204251700.g3PH03D15635@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Hiten Pandya Subject: Re: docs/37453: more suitable command-line in articles/releng/article.sgml Reply-To: Hiten Pandya Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/37453; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Hiten Pandya To: Hideyuki KURASHINA , freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/37453: more suitable command-line in articles/releng/article.sgml Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Hello, >Number: 37453 >Category: docs >Synopsis: more suitable command-line in articles/releng/article.sgml >Description: > 'cvs up' seems to work as well as 'cvs update', but cvs(1) doesn't > describe it. I think 'cvs update' is more suitable than 'cvs up' as an > article. If cvs(1) doesn't describe 'cvs up' properly, than I think it is the man page which needs the fix and not the article, afaik. All we need to do francly, is to add the following line to the cvs(1) man page which explains the 'update' command: %% Synonyms: up %% P.S: IMHO Regards, -- Hiten Pandya __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message