From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 17 11:38:11 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8F9106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:38:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0E68FC18
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:38:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-196-52-176.dynamic.qsc.de [92.196.52.176])
	by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB463CFFD;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:38:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n1HBbvIq001639;
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:37:57 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:37:57 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
Message-Id: <20090217123757.4685b67b.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <200902161044.02542.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
References: <20090212062505.ca66b93e.freebsd@edvax.de>
	<4993CB0A.7090809@gmail.com>
	<20090212083411.bbde5802.freebsd@edvax.de>
	<200902161044.02542.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Determining process preventing umount of busy partition
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:38:11 -0000

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:44:02 -0900, Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> Is this a one-time event or 100% reproducable?

I've tried it several times, it can always be reproduced.



> A likely scenario is:
> - You have squid running
> - You have rc_shutdowntimeout at default (30 seconds)

I'm not sure if this setting (?) will have an effect after trying
the umount operation in SUM. Even if umount is retried after a
several time, /usr is still "busy".



> - rc hits the watchdog while squid is being shutdown

No, nothing running. All applications have terminated.



> - you unmount
> - get busy
> - call fstat at which point squid has been shutdown.

I've used fstat and lsof to check for open files on /usr, nix,
nada, nitshewo.



> Replace squid with anything that takes 30+ seconds to shutdown. Allthough, 
> they would probably already fail at umount /var. Squid with defaults is fully 
> contained in /usr/local.

I can't imagine which application should still be running when nothing
on /usr is accessed (lsof, fstat); I'll check on running applications
using ps.




-- 
Polytropon
>From Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...