From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 17 10:44:54 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC5F106566B
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from leccine@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com
	[209.85.220.210])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B61C8FC12
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:44:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so3207809fxm.43
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=urxk2bHH9+xJYVuAHzO10dY8UVfS/E1rVS38wuzyxMA=;
	b=V4G+1ViYprpcoCfWhof2+QjN0Sxwy6MUIsPILZ/v1HrFhMJ5Q4kDxhp1kb8bWp5Kjh
	L9tTCmcV8eQFjgipPWwNiDSFfvqoh/+xU7GRYWUQMSrq3eXMPGAQw8Uqg84iKMGl9l4M
	GK42/aLiM5nvVVbdgy9GyHZ9WuOfcN/UTf1Ew=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=QAwOCkBkyCUO+QczUy8j1ERo5ev4v/0jRgLZD9uU06VZ9aETznMBRZEm4MgkDEGQhr
	+4r7mTnDOie2B2T8d3rI2pZX/IrNpjDl4ZHpNQsdg5Z4H8V+hEW71UqUlZssYP+Tkwcu
	vz3TTQpRlDwaVLKHaAEL76wKrnJwPMpJHBoxU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.154.142 with SMTP id o14mr2358700bkw.125.1255776293089; 
	Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d763ac660910170315l2b46c823l2ce4e5cc1edd959d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <78DB4AE8EF5F4A1EBD3992D7404B2725@china.huawei.com>
	<b8592ed80910150512k6d334f89s3fa308a85e19da9e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4831593800614E6796A45F20BA4B818E@china.huawei.com>
	<b8592ed80910160528h604efc27w87c11a0593ce9fe8@mail.gmail.com>
	<d763ac660910170315l2b46c823l2ce4e5cc1edd959d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:44:53 +0100
Message-ID: <b8592ed80910170344oe46c8ew9ea9110858643ca7@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SXN0duFu?= <leccine@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: Hongtao Yin <htyin@huawei.com>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Comparison of FreeBSD/Linux TCP Throughput performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:44:55 -0000

I guess it is not only for netpipe, it is doing a pretty decent job changin=
g
the packet size checking the performance so finally you have an overview
about the size, lag, bw

I like! :)

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> 2009/10/16 Istv=E1n <leccine@gmail.com>:
> > I see.
> > It shows that linux default setup is better.
>
> .. being completely correct, it shows the linux default setup _for
> netpipe_ is better on that particular hardware.
>
> That identifies a few other variables which may need addressing. :)
>
>
> Adrian
>



--=20
the sun shines for all