Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 15:19:22 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@vector.enet> To: Jukka Ukkonen <jau@jau.csc.fi> Cc: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert), jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rusers(3) & rnusers(3) Message-ID: <199512191419.PAA03704@vector.enet> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Dec 1995 11:38:50 %2B0200." <199512180938.LAA09745@jau.csc.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Reference: > From: Jukka Ukkonen <jau@jau.csc.fi> > Subject: Re: rusers(3) & rnusers(3) > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 11:38:50 +0200 (EET) > Message-id: <199512180938.LAA09745@jau.csc.fi> > > Quoting Terry Lambert: > > > > > > After getting a bit frustrated of not having the library routin - es > > > > rusers(3) and rnusers(3) available on FreeBSD I wrote them as w - ell > > > > as the underlying xdr_utmpidlearr etc. I have tested them to wo - rk > > > > > > Cool! Anybody going to pick this one up? Should I? > > > > Note that it was not posted under BSD license. It was limited such > > that you are not allowed to sell it. > > Well, my note did not say you should not sell e.g. a CD containing May we cut this sort of debate short (after all we want to talk about code right, not everyone's personal variant views on intellectual property rights :-) I believe [core@ please correct me if I'm wrong] our policy is Only to import into the src/ tree things that are UCB/BSD licence style compliant (ie take the UCB blurb, remove UCB & insert own name), with the single exception of FSF gnu/ & FSF optional non essential kernel modules ? Anything else with more restrictions goes in ports (if anywhere) Let's keep it simple folks please, Thanks :-) Jukka, Would you be willing to use a UCB/BSD style header, replacing all occurences of UCB Regents etc with your name ? (Hopefully :-) Best Regards, Julian. -- Julian H. Stacey jhs@freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512191419.PAA03704>