Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:22:58 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Goran_Meki=c4=87?= <meka@tilda.center>
To:        =?UTF-8?Q?Corvin_K=c3=b6hne?= <corvink@FreeBSD.org>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Sudden need for bhyve TPM Emulation... willing to port swtpm?
Message-ID:  <06ae27b6-7a38-ff73-8d9b-70b6be517ccc@tilda.center>
In-Reply-To: <2c1205c0fc48e8c6ac103d3f3ca0c722a7cd3c6e.camel@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <662af723-de9f-36d9-c960-ef08379ca26e@callfortesting.org> <1d4e6558-0c56-5758-d87e-e9bf4aacc0a5@tilda.center> <85ee3beda055c5bc9fae26c07247fe0cea1458e9.camel@FreeBSD.org> <2f1539fc-f8b2-2ec5-9c68-c60f68e66c0e@tilda.center> <2c1205c0fc48e8c6ac103d3f3ca0c722a7cd3c6e.camel@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,

There's an update for swtpm and I submitted 
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273199. My first 
question is if phabricator is preferred for this port? I'm OK with 
submitting it on either place, so whatever is easier.

With updated port there's also support for CUSE, which would allow swtpm 
to be used with pass-through. The problem is that socket and CUSE have 
problems which I described in upstream issue: 
https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm/issues/820. If there are any 
suggestions how to fix that fuse error, I'd like to hear them and try 
and fix it.

Regards,
meka




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?06ae27b6-7a38-ff73-8d9b-70b6be517ccc>