From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 12 23:02:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA5416A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:02:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m19.mx.aol.com (imo-m19.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8171C43D1D for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4526@aol.com) Received: from TM4526@aol.com by imo-m19.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id o.128.4f9daa02 (3842); Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:02:27 -0500 (EST) From: TM4526@aol.com Message-ID: <128.4f9daa02.2ec69b02@aol.com> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:02:26 EST To: subhro.kar@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 Network performance tests X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:02:33 -0000 In a message dated 11/11/04 1:36:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, subhro.kar@gmail.com writes: >FreeBSD 4.10: 42% interrupt usage >FreeBSD 5.3: 58% interrupt usage >Thanks for your test results. Was DEVICE_POLLING enables in the kernel and >the sysctl? No, it wasnt