From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 07:18:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA2937B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 07:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.mail.uk.psi.net (relay4.mail.uk.psi.net [154.32.111.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9442E43F75 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 07:18:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmlb@dmlb.org) Received: from gate.ttpcom.com ([193.119.175.2] helo=vader) by relay4.mail.uk.psi.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 19HlTD-0006b7-00 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 15:18:31 +0100 Received: from matrix.ttpcom.com ([193.119.172.14]) by vader; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:32:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from matrix [193.119.172.14] by matrix.ttpcom.com (SMTPD32-7.07) id A79C20390106; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:36:44 +0100 Received: FROM DJK1Comp BY matrix ; Mon May 19 09:36:43 2003 +0100 Message-ID: <001401c31de1$424dd4f0$a7ac77c1@DJK1Comp> From: "Duncan Barclay" To: "M. Warner Losh" References: Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:33:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4920.2300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4920.2300 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Centrino Laptop (Acer 800Cli) and 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:18:34 -0000 From: "Duncan Barclay" > > On 18-May-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: > > Duncan Barclay writes: > >: I'm looking for suggestions on how to debug 5.1 to get a bit further in the > >: boot cycle! > > > > From the acpi man page: > ... > > Thanks Warner. I will try these. Earlier today I managed to work out that > the kernel gets to execing init from init_main:start_init() > but goes into a loop in fork_trampoline. I'm going to do some poking around > tonight. This is all after disabling acpi. > > Duncan Futher update. Kernel threads are started and seem to be running (you can break to the debugger), but init is not actually launched. The machine is busy waiting somewhere (evidenced by the fan coming on). Is there some flag I can turn on to tell me what locks are being taken released - it may be something in another sub-system. Duncan