From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 29 3:36:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from login-2.eunet.no (login-2.eunet.no [193.71.71.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDD014EC8; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 03:36:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (mbendiks@login-1.eunet.no [193.71.71.238]) by login-2.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.0/GN) with ESMTP id MAA20569; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:36:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA05143; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:36:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:36:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: W Gerald Hicks , adrian@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, wghicks@wghicks.bellsouth.net Subject: Re: Adding desktop support In-Reply-To: <37281E66.7AAF71A3@newsguy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > AFAIK, he is making the existing fs (more specifically nullfs and > maybe unionfs) work, not correcting any existing flaw in the > layering code. From what he's told me, this is not correct. In fact, his efforts are, as I recall, specifically targetted at resolving issues in the actual layering code, not in the fs themselves. - Marius - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message