Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:12:29 +0300
From:      "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <vova@express.ru>
To:        "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: MAJOR changes to the ports system
Message-ID:  <1075893137.779.43.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1075883492.76993.65.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402040021500.71519-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <1075883492.76993.65.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=F7 =D3=D2, 04.02.2004, =D7 11:31, Joe Marcus Clarke =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4:
> On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 03:22, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> >=20
> > > Sorry for the wide distribution, but it is critical that -CURRENT use=
rs
> > > hear this.  Two _MAJOR_ changes just went in to the ports tree that a=
re
> > > bound to cause some pain to -CURRENT users. =20
> > >=20
> >=20
> > I'm glad to hear about this and I wouldn't mind hearing regularly about
> > major events over in the ports tree.
>=20
> I've started doing this.  The full summary was sent to ports@ and
> ports-developers@, plus I added a copy to /usr/ports/CHANGES.  This is
> now the second major ports update I've summarized.  Once the archives
> get back up to speed, you should be able to see my previous summary.

How about gettext -> gettext-old transition ? A lot of ports still=20
depends on gettext-old while others on gettext, gettext conflicts with=20
gettext-old, and, as result, portupgrade -af constatntly tries to
install gettext-old as dependancy and fails.

> Joe

--=20
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov <vova@fbsd.ru>
SWsoft Inc.
--=20
Vladimir B. Grebenchikov
TSB "Russian Express"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1075893137.779.43.camel>