Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:30:18 GMT From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/74477: [patch] Correct several links in the contributing article Message-ID: <200603200930.k2K9UIwa071206@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/74477; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To: Vitaly Bogdanov <gad@gad.glazov.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/74477: [patch] Correct several links in the contributing article
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:26:11 +0000
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 11:04:58AM +0400, Vitaly Bogdanov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > The following reply was made to PR docs/74477; it has been noted by GNATS.
> >
> > From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
> > To: Vitaly Bogdanov <gad@gad.glazov.net>,
> > <freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: docs/74477: [patch] Correct several links in the contributing
> > article
> > Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:32:12 +0000
> >
> > On 17/3/06 17:00, "Vitaly Bogdanov" <gad@gad.glazov.net> wrote:
> >
> > > As I can understand, there are no advantages in using `'&url.base;/.....`'
> > > for www/ content. Simple using absolute dns names
> > > everywhere in references to web-site content (not doc/ tree) seems to be
> > > more superior and easy solution.
> >
> > That breaks mirroring.
>
> But we use absolute dns names in many (maybe in all) FDP documents.
Actually, we try hard not to. That's why &base; and &enbase; exist.
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603200930.k2K9UIwa071206>