From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 26 21:00:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218BD16A72B for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 21:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A682443D58 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 21:00:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4QL0tAt081979 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 21:00:55 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4QL0t8U081978; Fri, 26 May 2006 21:00:55 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:00:55 GMT Message-Id: <200605262100.k4QL0t8U081978@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gnome@FreeBSD.org From: "Jeremy Messenger" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/97791: gnomevfs2: add FAM choice to options X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jeremy Messenger List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:00:56 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/97791; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Jeremy Messenger" To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: tgyurci@freemail.hu Subject: Re: ports/97791: gnomevfs2: add FAM choice to options Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:00:43 -0500 Why not? :-) If it is not going to cause any problem, then I see no problem with add this option. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org