From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 29 3:57:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.vnet.net (smtp1.vnet.net [166.82.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED0514F0E for ; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 03:57:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp1.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA14373; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 06:58:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA34174; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 06:57:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.2/8.6.9) id GAA20645; Thu, 29 Apr 1999 06:57:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 06:57:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199904291057.GAA20645@lakes.dignus.com> To: mbendiks@eunet.no, nate@mt.sri.com Subject: Re: Adding desktop support Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jabley@clear.co.nz In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > The fact that the user may not like the icon you've chosen to use due to > > many criteria, including size, # of colors, transparency, 2D/3D, etc... > > That's where overrides, and such, come into it. Some users will not like > the defaults and want to change them, whereas other users don't want to > mess with it at all. I say, stick a tag in buildworld, and there are no > issues with this. Overrides would be the task of the window manager in > question. > > - Marius - I point out that if the executable has no icon in it, then this "overrides" from the window manager would come into play, right? Since the "overrides" have to be there anyway - what's the advantage of putting the icon in the exe? - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message