From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 30 11:56:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D85816A407; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailout1.pacific.net.au (mailout1-3.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F5943D46; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:56:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679CC61FF88; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:56:15 +1000 (EST) Received: from epsplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id k8UBuC9d012947; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:56:13 +1000 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:56:11 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@epsplex.bde.org To: John-Mark Gurney In-Reply-To: <20060929231007.GS80527@funkthat.com> Message-ID: <20060930215218.V1683@epsplex.bde.org> References: <451C4850.5030302@freebsd.org> <451D884F.1030807@cisco.com> <20060929213722.GR80527@funkthat.com> <451D973C.8070004@freebsd.org> <20060929231007.GS80527@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Randall Stewart , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann , gallatin@cs.duke.edu Subject: Re: Much improved sosend_*() functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:56:16 -0000 On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 23:59 +0200: >> mbufs are 256 bytes. > > Hmmm.. I keep getting this confused... maybe because there was discussion > about increasing this a few years back... or maybe because NOTES has > it as 512.. :) It would be a bug if NOTES had the default size. Notes is supposed to alter defaults so that non-default code paths get tested. It often uses the default plus 1 or the default times 2 (the latter when the value must be a power of 2). Bruce