From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  4 03:20:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B659F16A4CE; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 03:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.applecomm.net (www.applecomm.net [203.206.135.118])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BBA8D43D2F; Wed,  4 Feb 2004 03:20:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from andrewjt@applecomm.net)
Received: from [192.168.14.2] ([202.59.97.76])
	by www.applecomm.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i14BLBQ26639;
	Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:21:12 +1100
From: Andrew Thomson <andrewjt@applecomm.net>
To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040203155309.GA22676@gvr.gvr.org>
References: <1074650025.701.82.camel@itouch-1011.prv.au.itouchnet.net>
	 <20040122110929.GA767@gvr.gvr.org>
	 <20040203070435.GB46486@blossom.cjclark.org>
	 <20040203155309.GA22676@gvr.gvr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1075893572.29017.1.camel@oblivion>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.2FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 22:19:33 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipsec changes in 5.2R
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:20:14 -0000

Thanks, that worked a treat for me too.. everything back to normal!

So what's the go with this fast_ipsec business. Is this going to be the
main implementation for Freebsd?

thanks for the tip,

ajt.

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 16:53 +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:04:36PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > > I have seen the same. Somehow it looks like ISAKMP traffic, which used to
> > > go around the ipsec policy, is now included. The only workaround I know
> > > of is to replace "require" with "use".
> > 
> > A little late on this, but FAST_IPSEC rather than KAME IPsec will fix
> > the problem.
> 
> Thanks! That helped!
> 
> -Guido