Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 22:19:33 +1100 From: Andrew Thomson <andrewjt@applecomm.net> To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipsec changes in 5.2R Message-ID: <1075893572.29017.1.camel@oblivion> In-Reply-To: <20040203155309.GA22676@gvr.gvr.org> References: <1074650025.701.82.camel@itouch-1011.prv.au.itouchnet.net> <20040122110929.GA767@gvr.gvr.org> <20040203070435.GB46486@blossom.cjclark.org> <20040203155309.GA22676@gvr.gvr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks, that worked a treat for me too.. everything back to normal! So what's the go with this fast_ipsec business. Is this going to be the main implementation for Freebsd? thanks for the tip, ajt. On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 16:53 +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:04:36PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > > I have seen the same. Somehow it looks like ISAKMP traffic, which used to > > > go around the ipsec policy, is now included. The only workaround I know > > > of is to replace "require" with "use". > > > > A little late on this, but FAST_IPSEC rather than KAME IPsec will fix > > the problem. > > Thanks! That helped! > > -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1075893572.29017.1.camel>