From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 11 18:20:54 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0835116A417;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:20:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org)
Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CD413C44B;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:20:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org)
Received: from kobe.laptop (vader.bytemobile-rio.ondsl.gr [83.235.57.37])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-9) with ESMTP id lBBIJT0R008968
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:19:50 +0200
Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1])
	by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lBBIJNp7001918;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:19:23 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org)
Received: (from keramida@localhost)
	by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id lBBIJM10001917;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:19:22 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:19:22 +0200
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org>
Message-ID: <20071211181921.GC1712@kobe.laptop>
References: <fjho0k$hdc$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071210002131.GA74729@kobe.laptop>
	<002801c83b05$56ab20b0$3a2a13ac@staff.ktc.lan>
	<20071211004258.GA11140@kobe.laptop>
	<20071211004531.GB11140@kobe.laptop>
	<200712111153.lBBBrmYl001945@fire.js.berklix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200712111153.lBBBrmYl001945@fire.js.berklix.net>
X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
	score=-4.1, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80,
	AWL 0.30, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org
X-Spam-Status: No
Cc: Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net>, rrs@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 trivial problems / notes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:20:54 -0000

On 2007-12-11 12:53, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> > Does the following look ok?
>> A more complete patch, touching GENERIC for all architectures would be
>> like the following patch, of course:
>
> Looks good, it would be nice if someone commited that.
>    ( I too got bitten by SCTP, when commenting out INET6 (which
>      I didnt want, while leaving in SCTP for later removal, as I
>      didnt know if something else new might depend on SCTP).

Thanks! :)

I am not sure if SCTP can work, or if it's expected to work at all, in
INET6-only systems, so it's probably worth waiting for rrs@ to review
the patch first.  I'll commit it once we get his approval.