From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 20 18:33:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2569616A4CE
	for <gnome@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:33:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org
	(73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA6243D5F
	for <gnome@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:33:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org)
Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org
	[IPv6:2001:470:1f01:198:210:4bff:fe3d:e256])
	by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1C293659F;
	Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:33:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:32:50 +0200
From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
Message-Id: <20050420203250.597f6ae8.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
In-Reply-To: <op.spjl56u59aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References: <20050420194825.76ebf3c0.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
	<op.spjl56u59aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.8 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="PGP-SHA1";
 boundary="Signature=_Wed__20_Apr_2005_20_32_50_+0200_a0CQv7U7OT+SeLOP"
cc: gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Can somebody please have a look at ports/78931?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:33:32 -0000

--Signature=_Wed__20_Apr_2005_20_32_50_+0200_a0CQv7U7OT+SeLOP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:11:56 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> wrote:

> Not useful to me, but it's up to someone in my team if he likes OPTIONS =
=20
> stuff. Anyway, I took a bit look at it and I don't think few knobs will =
=20

Could you elaborate on why you don't think OPTIONS are useful? I'm
honestly interested.

> work because of the OPTIONS don't work with the autocheck very well. I =20
> only see useful in your PR is that two knobs that have exist() should be =
=20
> move under .include <bsd.port.pre.mk> and change DATADIR in plist.

I did test builds with BATCH=3Dyes and it worked fine. If there's
anything wrong I'd love to know about it. To make it clear: Whether the
consensus is to get it in the tree or drop it, it's fine. What I'd like
to avoid is to have the PR sitting in limbo for months.

Cheers,
--=20
Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org
PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1


--Signature=_Wed__20_Apr_2005_20_32_50_+0200_a0CQv7U7OT+SeLOP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCZqBVnLctrNyFFPERAnTSAJwKc7yuV4GjV8Z1qnpSw96PxWyXSQCfaD9e
hrp1ZiWy/60wE5+ubiErYl4=
=QznT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Wed__20_Apr_2005_20_32_50_+0200_a0CQv7U7OT+SeLOP--