Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 01:00:59 -0700 From: Derek Kulinski <takeda@takeda.tk> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? Message-ID: <6a2843fd-1574-440d-a3c5-83aeb106b854@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <201211032130.PAA04484@lariat.net> References: <201211032130.PAA04484@lariat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I personally let it be enabled during installation. I noticed that I was getting errors on fsck even after clean shutdown. After noticing it, I disabled it and the problems go away. Also, fsck works really fast so I don't see much advantage with SU+J. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> wrote: >Have been following the thread related to SU+J, and am wondering: why >is it >considered to be undesirable on SSDs (assuming that they have good wear >leveling)? I have been enabling it on systems with SSDs, hoping that >between >the lack of rotating media and the journaling I would have very robust >systems. > >--Brett Glass >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6a2843fd-1574-440d-a3c5-83aeb106b854>