From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Dec 28 10:19:11 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id KAA19884
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 28 Dec 1996 10:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id KAA19875;
          Sat, 28 Dec 1996 10:18:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA07432; Sat, 28 Dec 1996 10:18:51 -0800 (PST)
To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm)
cc: se@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: option FAILSAFE in GENERIC and LINT a bit misleading ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 28 Dec 1996 14:34:00 +0100."
             <Mutt.19961228143400.andreas@klemm.gtn.com> 
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 10:18:51 -0800
Message-ID: <7429.851797131@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'd suggest to rename the FAILSAFE option to NCR_FAILSAFE until
> other modules use this FAILSAFE option as well.

I think it'd be far better just to get other modules using FAILSAFE
as soon as we can.  Why change something we're only going to have to
change back again?

						Jordan