From owner-freebsd-security Mon May 22 0:55:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950C437B6C4 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 00:55:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA15463; Mon, 22 May 2000 00:57:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Will Andrews Cc: Matthew Dillon , Doug Barton , Brett Glass , Warner Losh , cjclark@home.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The procfs Hole in 2.2.8-STABLE? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 May 2000 03:11:48 EDT." <20000522031147.Q96325@argon.blackdawn.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 00:57:17 -0700 Message-ID: <15460.958982237@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I agree completely with this, and hope that Jordan doesn't have a 3.5 > planned. We need to move forward and focus more on RELENG_4. Woogod, let's not go here again! We went over the whole "what was planned WILL happen" thread ad-nauseum about a month ago and suffice it to say that 3.5 WILL happen, it's been requested by at least twice as many people as have asked that it not happen, end of story. In fact, there were previously plans to do it as a "network only" release and not do a CD release, but BSDi has been forced to change even that decision in the face of customer pressure. Various customers are saying that they want 3.5 on CD and they're waving their checkbooks around. In the world of business, that generally results in a change of heart and this situation is no different. If BSDi didn't do a CD of 3.5, somebody else also would have. I have hard evidence of this. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message