Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:11:18 -0600
From:      Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Subject:   Re: Annoying SCSI waiting...
Message-ID:  <41799396.9090307@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <41799315.70201@elischer.org>
References:  <417960C2.8040007@freebsd.org> <20041022194008.GA23778@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <41796396.5070804@freebsd.org> <p06110423bd9f1b6312ed@[128.113.24.47]> <41796D6D.7000108@freebsd.org> <41799315.70201@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> 
> Scott Long wrote:
> 
>>
>> For just about everyone, a value of 2 seconds or less is just fine.
>> For those with tape drives, changers, and (less likely) cdroms, a
>> long delay after reset is still quite necessary.  There are two knobs
>> to adjust this, and I'd like GENERIC to remain compatible.  It's 15
>> seconds, not 2 minutes.  You get a longer delay that that just trying
>> to set up the inital page tables on a large memory machine! 
> 
> 
> 
> for some reason the actual wait time always seems t be twice the
> nominated one for me..
> i.e. 15 seconds really seems ot take 30 seconds etc.
> 
> 

I'm willing to crank it down to 5 sec in HEAD.  However, before I go 
changing a whole bunch of identical lines in nearly identical GENERIC
files, I'd like to see GENERIC get split into several sub-modules that
live in /sys/conf and can be included instead of constantly duplicated.
i.e.

/sys/conf:
/SCSI
/BLOCK
/NIC
/USB
/FIREWIRE

etc.

Again, only for HEAD, not for RELENG_5.  Thoughts?

Scott



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41799396.9090307>