From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 05:28:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6484616A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:28:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA0543D3F for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:28:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47569652EC; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:28:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 57955-03; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (unknown [213.210.24.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B4D651EB; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 51BA36530; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:28:49 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:28:49 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson To: dpk Message-ID: <20050110052849.GC709@empiric.icir.org> References: <20050108191218.L42157@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050108191218.L42157@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wondering about a patch (DELL ERA/RAC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:28:44 -0000 On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 07:17:33PM -0800, dpk wrote: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2003-August/002733.html > Will this patch be making its way in to the kernel? The Dells are still > shipping with cards that have no drivers (this pciconf -v -l is from a > 1750): The patch would need to be rewritten to use the puc driver shim or possibly even Marcel's uart stuff, but it's certainly possible. The patch as it stands is applicable to NetBSD. uart would probably be a cleaner place to put it. Regards, BMS