From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 18 03:13:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8572A16A4CE; Tue, 18 May 2004 03:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (adsl-68-122-7-9.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net
	[68.122.7.9])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4C41943D99; Tue, 18 May 2004 03:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4IACaAd007680;
	Tue, 18 May 2004 03:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from das@localhost)
	by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i4IACaYb007679;
	Tue, 18 May 2004 03:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 03:12:36 -0700
From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20040518101236.GB7186@VARK.homeunix.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Nikita@Namesys.COM, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com
References: <16552.64697.572176.262372@laputa.namesys.com>
	<200405180428.i4I4SH7E019389@gw.catspoiler.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200405180428.i4I4SH7E019389@gw.catspoiler.org>
cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: Nikita@Namesys.COM
cc: mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com
Subject: Re: QMail and SoftUpdates
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 10:13:40 -0000

On Mon, May 17, 2004, Don Lewis wrote:
> Based on the information I found using Google, it appears that qmail
> relies on link(2) being synchronous to let it know that a queued message
> is safely on the disk with a known file name before it issues the "250"
> response. I believe this was true without softupdates, but with
> softupdates enabled it is definitely not true.

If this is true, it's a boog in qmail[1].  The link(2) syscall
guarantees atomicity, but not durability.  This is why fsync(2)
exists.


[1] I would call it a ``bug'', but then I would be uttering one of
    the magic phrases to invoke djb in a public forum.