Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:49:10 -0500 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> To: Frederick Joseph Ross <fjr6b@galileo.phys.virginia.edu> Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: glib-2* vs. glib2* in gnome_upgrade.sh Message-ID: <opr68ej8nz8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404272311200.15017-100000@node10.galileo> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404272311200.15017-100000@node10.galileo>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:15:52 -0400 (EDT), Frederick Joseph Ross <fjr6b@galileo.phys.virginia.edu> wrote: > I'm not sure if this is correct or no, but with a CVSup'd ports tree, I > had to go in and change glib-2* to glib2* on line 64 to make the script > carry through. Otherwise it complained about not being able to find said > port. > > Otherwise, all has gone quite smoothly. Well done packaging this! Nope, the glib-2* is correct. ============================= # pkg_info | grep glib glib-1.2.10_10 Some useful routines of C programming (previous stable vers glib-2.4.0 Some useful routines of C programming (current stable versi ruby18-glib2-0.9.1 Ruby binding for GLib2 ============================= Cheers, Mezz > Fred Ross > High Energy Physics Laboratory > University of Virginia -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opr68ej8nz8ckrg5>